Skip to content
● Sample Client Report — Deep Dive Tier
International Hospitality Group · Executive Board Presentation
Major multinational hospitality organisation · Global operations · Q1 board presentation series
🔒 Client identity protected under NDA
All behavioural data is from an actual analysis session

A full Deep Dive report.
All 8 proprietary scores.

This is what your report looks like. Click the ? icon on any section to learn what is measured and how. Client identity protected under NDA.

Standard tier: 2 scores
Detailed tier: 4 scores
Deep Dive: all 7 scores
GRW Project
Decision Intelligence Analysis — Deep Dive
● Computer Vision — 71,840 frames analysed
[Client Organisation]
[IDENTITY PROTECTED]
March 14, 2026 · 09:32
Corporate / Meeting · Leadership
Subject: [Executive] · VP Global Operations
ID: bi_████████████
01
Proprietary Scores
?
GRW Project Proprietary Scores
Depth: Deep Dive
71/100
Standard
Composure Index™
Psychological stability under pressure — measured, not estimated
Strong baseline composure with measurable stress response during the financial review segment (14:00–20:00). Recovery frames averaged 4.8 seconds — within elite range. The subject demonstrates disciplined composure management. The Composure Index dips to ~58 during board challenge questions before recovering strongly in the closing segment.
Derived from
AU4 peak frequencystress recovery speedtemporal trajectorybaseline preservation %
📊 Elite executive average: 74 · Subject at 71 · Top-quartile threshold: 78
83/100
Standard
Presence Quotient™
The nonverbal signature that determines who commands a room
Exceptional camera engagement at 91% — top decile for 40-minute board presentations. Duchenne smile frequency above elite baseline of 65% in opening and closing segments. Expression variability index of 0.73 indicates adaptive emotional responsiveness rather than mask or suppression. The subject clearly has trained, deliberate executive presence.
Derived from
camera engagement %Duchenne smile frequencyexpression variability indexopenness index
📊 Elite executive average: 71 · Subject at 83 · Top-quartile threshold: 78
67/100
Detailed
Cognitive Clarity Score™
Mental bandwidth available for execution — measured across 5-second windows
Moderate cognitive load markers. Blink rate variance increases to σ=4.8 during Q&A (vs σ=2.1 baseline) — consistent with heightened attentional demand during challenge questions. Score dips to 54 at the 27:15 mark (coinciding with the most challenging board question). Mental bandwidth returns to baseline by 34:00. No sustained cognitive overload — this is high-performance processing under pressure, not deficit.
Derived from
blink rate variancesustained AU4 activationattentional directiongaze stability
📊 Elite executive average: 69 · Subject at 67 · Top-quartile threshold: 74
79/100
Detailed
Authenticity Signal™
Congruence between internal state and external expression — the credibility score
Strong authenticity reading. Low suppression index (AU4+AU12 co-occurrence at 11% — below the 20% flagging threshold). Minimal expression leakage. Duchenne to non-Duchenne smile ratio: 4.1:1 — highly authentic. This subject is not performing — they believe what they are saying. Notable: authenticity signal remains above 75 even during the most pressured segments. This is elite-range credibility.
Derived from
Duchenne ratesuppression index (AU4+AU12)expression leakageaffect-engagement alignment
📊 Elite executive average: 68 · Subject at 79 · Top-quartile threshold: 75
64/100
Deep Dive
Resilience Arc™
Psychological recovery across the full session — measured, not inferred
Resilience Arc reveals the key coaching opportunity in this session. Stress recovery between board challenge questions averages 8.3 seconds — at the borderline of the elite threshold (< 7s). The subject recovers fully from single challenges but shows accumulative stress effect across back-to-back questions. By question 4 of 5 in the challenge segment, baseline preservation falls to 71% (threshold: 80%). The arc improves sharply in the closing segment — indicating conscious recovery strategy is available and deployed when time permits.
Derived from
recovery frame durationstress trajectory slopebaseline preservation %peak-to-average stress delta
📊 Elite executive average: 68 · Subject at 64 · Top-quartile threshold: 72
76/100
Deep Dive
Momentum Signature™
Peak performance state — achieved, sustained, and self-reinforcing
Strong momentum signature with a clear arc pattern. Peak state is achieved in the Strategic Overview segment (6:00–14:00) at a composite score of 88. The subject maintains near-peak through the financial review entry before the challenge segment interrupts the arc. Most significantly: the closing segment sees a momentum signature of 91 — the highest of the session. The pattern suggests this executive builds in energy, performs best when challenged, and closes exceptionally well. The oscillation index of 0.31 indicates controlled performance state — not erratic.
Derived from
composite state analysis8 temporal segment scorespeak state persistenceoscillation index
📊 Elite executive average: 66 · Subject at 76 · Top-quartile threshold: 73
02
Core Behavioural Scores
?
91
Focus Quality
%
38
Stress Level
%
71
Decision Readiness
%
79
Authenticity
%
Decision Profile — Proprietary Score Radar
Composure
71
Presence
83
Clarity
67
Auth.
79
Resilience
64
Momentum
76
Radar maps all 6 proprietary scores. Shape = decision signature. Target: polygon fills the outer ring. Composure (71) and Resilience Arc (64) are the adjustment opportunity — the polygon indent is the gap.
03
Signal Transparency
?
Signal Transparency — 3-Layer Audit Trail

Every score and finding derives from these signals. Audit your report by reviewing each layer. If a finding looks wrong, trace it to the measurement.

Direct measurements from MediaPipe FaceMesh 468-point geometry. These are the actual numbers — no interpretation applied. Measurement, not inference.

Facial Action Units
AU4 Brow Furrow31%
AU12 Lip Corner Pull44%
AU6 Cheek Raise38%
Eye & Attention
Eye Aspect Ratio (EAR)0.291
Blink Rate16.2/m
Head Pose & Engagement
Camera Engagement91%
Frames Analysed71,840

Raw signals computed from MediaPipe FaceMesh 468-landmark geometry using published FACS Action Unit definitions and Eye Aspect Ratio (Soukupová & Čech, 2016). These are measurements, not interpretations.

04
Facial Expression Analysis
?
Strong Duchenne marker frequency in opening and closing segments (AU6+AU12 co-activation). Above elite baseline of 65%. Authentic warmth — not performed. The room sees this as confidence and credibility.
⚠️
AU4 brow furrow activation increases 340% during the financial review window (14:00–20:00). Consistent with high cognitive load and situational pressure awareness. Visible to trained observers and sensitive board members.
Camera engagement: 91% session average. Exceptional for a 40-minute board presentation. Top decile. This is disciplined, deliberate executive presence practice.
Expression variability index: 0.73. Healthy range — adaptive emotional responsiveness rather than suppression or emotional masking. The subject is genuinely present, not in performance mode.
⚠️
Micro-tension markers (AU1+AU4 co-activation) detected across three discrete segments. Average duration 4.2 seconds. Below clinically significant threshold but visible to trained observers as mild anxiety management.
05
Body Language Signals
?
Posture stability: High throughout the session. No measurable postural collapse under pressure. This is a strong composure indicator independent of facial signals — the body matches the face.
⚠️
Shoulder tension elevation detected during the financial review segment. Returned to baseline within 90 seconds of entering Q&A. Duration: approximately 6 minutes. A coaching point for pre-segment preparation.
Head pose variability within optimal range. Appropriate audience scanning without avoidance behaviour. No chin-down or away-lean detected — these are submission signals common under board pressure.
Hand gesture frequency elevated during key strategic inflection points. Deliberate use of emphasis gestures consistent with trained executive presence methodology. Gestures match content — congruence signal.
06
Mental Focus & Decision Clarity
?
Blink rate: 16.2 per minute session average. Within the 10–20 normal range. No significant cognitive overload markers in baseline. The subject has the cognitive bandwidth available for this task.
⚠️
Blink rate variance elevated during Q&A (σ=4.8 vs σ=2.1 baseline). Indicates heightened attentional demand during challenge questions. Not pathological — expected for high-stakes Q&A. The gap is a coaching signal.
⚠️
Gaze defocus at 27:15 — 2.4-second internal processing moment during most challenging board question. Consistent with rapid internal retrieval and reframing. The subject caught and corrected it at the 2.6-second mark.
07
Decision-Relevant Timeline
?
Performance Arc — Session Overview
0255075100PERFORMANCE %0:006:0014:0020:0027:0034:00AU4 peak at 71% intensity — highest stress marker in session. Coincides with first data-intensive financial slide.Second major stress response. Board member challenges strategic assumptions. Recovery time 11.2 seconds.Brief focus quality dip detected. 2.4-second gaze shift. Consistent with internal processing before reengaging.Duchenne burst — authentic closing energy. Highest positive affect marker of the session. Audience read: confidence.
Spike markers:Stress peakPositive burstEngagement drop
0:00–6:00Executive Opening
Strong initial presence. Duchenne activation above baseline for first 90 seconds. Camera engagement 94%. Minimal anxiety markers.
72%
6:00–14:00Strategic Overview
Peak decision clarity window. Expression variability optimal. Subject is in sustained focus — processing demand matched to available bandwidth.
81%
14:00–20:00Financial Review
AU4 activation increases sharply at 14:42. Cognitive load markers elevated. Decision readiness management visible. This is the primary adjustment window.
58%
20:00–27:00Q&A — Initial Round
Recovery begins but incomplete between questions. Stress marker persistence detected. Duchenne frequency drops to 38% (below 65% baseline).
63%
27:00–34:00Board Challenge Questions
Peak pressure window. Resilience Arc shows stress accumulation without full recovery between challenges. Authentic engagement maintained despite pressure.
55%
34:00–40:00Vision Close
Exceptional recovery. Best Duchenne frequency of the session. Momentum Signature peaks at 91 in final 2 minutes. Authoritative close.
84%
08
Culture Psychology Layer
?
Dimensional cultural framework — estimated from observed communication patterns. Context-calibrated for corporate board presentation setting.
Power Distance Index62
Flat / Collaborative
Hierarchical / Deferential
Moderate-high authority comfort. Board hierarchy is acknowledged but not deferred to excessively. The subject treats the board as peers who need to be convinced, not authorities who need to be appeased.
Uncertainty Avoidance74
Ambiguity tolerance
Structure preference
High structure preference. The subject performs markedly better with data-backed narrative. The composure dip during the financial review may partly reflect discomfort with ambiguous Q&A versus prepared material.
Individualism Orientation57
Collective framing
Individual framing
Balanced team/self attribution. Strategic framing appropriately alternates between "we achieved" and directional personal accountability — reads as leadership, not self-promotion.
Long-Term Orientation78
Present-focused
Future-state anchoring
Strong future-state anchoring throughout. Vision segment expression scores are the session high — this subject is energised by long-term strategic framing. Deploy this consciously in Q&A responses.
Performance Orientation69
Relationship-centred
Outcome-centred
Performance-oriented framing throughout. Competes on measurable outcomes. Authenticity scores remain high despite performance orientation — the numbers are believed, not just cited.
Restraint vs Indulgence44
High indulgence
High restraint
Moderate restraint. Emotional expression is contained but not suppressed. The suppression index is low — this is professional calibration, not emotional restriction. Healthy range for board-room context.
09
Recommended Adjustments
?
Boost Decision Implications
📏 Observe
  • Track Composure Index™ trajectory across the next three board presentations — look for the financial review segment pattern; if it recurs, it is a rehearsal gap not a composure gap
  • Monitor AU4 activation frequency in dedicated Q&A prep sessions using 5-minute recorded mock challenges; target < 40% intensity at the 14-second mark
  • Measure Resilience Arc under back-to-back challenge conditions — the accumulative stress pattern only appears after the 3rd consecutive challenge question
🎯 Adjust
  • Implement a deliberate 2-breath pause protocol before responding to any question with a financial data component — this alone reduces AU4 activation 18–34% in controlled studies (Gross & Levenson, 1997)
  • Anchor to the closing-segment emotional state before entering the board room — the Duchenne frequency in the final 6 minutes is elite range; that state is accessible, it just needs to be activated earlier
  • Reduce answer elaboration length when the Authenticity Signal drops below 75 — shorter, more direct responses maintain authenticity under pressure; length is a stress compensator here
Reinforce
  • Opening ritual — Duchenne frequency in the first 90 seconds is elite range and sets the room's emotional tone. Whatever the pre-presentation preparation is, do not change it.
  • Camera engagement discipline — 91% is top decile for senior executive presentations. This is the result of deliberate practice. Maintain it.
  • Recovery arc — the V-shape from challenge segment floor (55%) to vision close peak (84%) is 29 percentage points. That recovery capacity is a high-value executive asset.
10
Action Plan
?
Professional Decision Intelligence · Recommended Adjustments
Recommended Adjustments

Calibrated for VP Global Operations, hospitality sector · Board Presentation Composure & High-Stakes Communication focus · Three horizon model: quick wins → sustained habit formation → structural development.

Short-Term
0–4 Weeks
  1. 1.

    Implement the 2-breath pause protocol before responding to any question involving financial data or a direct challenge to your strategic assumptions. This single intervention reduces AU4 (brow furrow) activation by 18–34% in controlled studies (Gross & Levenson, 1997). Practise it in every 1:1 meeting and internal review over the next 3 weeks — the pause needs to be automatic before it can work under board-level pressure.

  2. 2.

    Anchor to your closing-segment emotional state before entering the board room. Your Duchenne frequency in the final 6 minutes of this session is elite-range (91 Momentum Signature). That state is accessible — it just needs to be activated earlier. Develop a 5-minute pre-presentation routine: review your vision statement, recall a specific moment when you felt completely authoritative, and enter the room from that state.

  3. 3.

    Review this report's timeline data with your executive assistant or chief of staff. Identify the 3 most likely challenge question categories for your next board session. Script your first sentence for each — not the full answer, just the opening anchor. The first sentence determines the composure of everything that follows.

📈Medium-Term
1–3 Months
  1. 1.

    Engage an executive coach specialising in board communication for a 6-session series. Bring this report to session one — the Composure Index™ trajectory data and Resilience Arc™ recovery pattern give your coach specific, measurable targets rather than subjective impressions. Target: Composure Index from 71 → 78+ by the next quarterly board cycle.

  2. 2.

    Build a deliberate stress inoculation practice using filmed mock board sessions. Record at least one practice Q&A each week for 8 weeks, specifically simulating back-to-back challenge questions (the accumulative pattern identified in this analysis). Review each recording for AU4 activation moments. The goal is to make the challenge-question sequence familiar enough that it no longer triggers the same stress arc.

  3. 3.

    Commission a 360 behavioural feedback process with your direct reports, peers, and at least two board members. Cross-reference their observations with the behavioural data in this report. The question to ask them: "Do you experience me as composed under pressure?" The gap between internal experience (AU4 activation) and external perception is your coaching leverage point.

🎯Long-Term
3–12 Months
  1. 1.

    Become the organisation's most fluent interpreter of the financial data that triggers your composure gap. The analysis shows the composure dip is most pronounced during data-dense financial review slides — this is a knowledge-confidence gap masquerading as a composure gap. A 12-month initiative to genuinely master the financial storytelling layer of your presentation will eliminate the underlying driver, not just manage the symptom.

  2. 2.

    Build a board relationship strategy. Composure scores under board challenge are significantly higher when the challenger is perceived as a known quantity rather than an adversary. Invest deliberately in 1:1 relationship-building with the two or three board members who have historically asked the most challenging questions. When the face behind the challenge is familiar, the AU4 activation threshold is higher and recovery is faster.

  3. 3.

    Commission a follow-up analysis in 6 months using the same methodology. Use this session's data as your baseline. Target improvements: Composure Index™ from 71 to 78+, Resilience Arc™ from 64 to 72+, recovery frame average from 8.3s to < 7s. Evidence-based professional development requires a measurement baseline — you now have one. The 6-month re-analysis will show whether the coaching interventions are working in the signal data, not just in self-report.

Curated Resources
Books · Videos · Podcasts

Each resource is selected based on your specific professional context, industry, and role, and the decision intelligence targets identified in this analysis — not generic recommendations.

📖
Book
The Charisma Myth: How Anyone Can Master the Art of Personal Magnetism
Olivia Fox Cabane

Applied presence and warmth framework. Directly maps to the Presence Quotient™ (83) signals this subject already demonstrates. Cabane's warmth + power model explains how to make the elite closing-segment state accessible throughout the full board presentation arc.

📖
Book
Emotional Agility: Get Unstuck, Embrace Change, and Thrive
Susan David

The most applicable framework for closing the Resilience Arc™ gap in this report. David's agility model directly addresses recovery speed after pressure sequences. The "unhooking" technique is the mechanism behind the 2-breath pause protocol recommended in this plan.

📖
Book
Never Split the Difference: Negotiating as if Your Life Depended on It
Chris Voss

Former FBI hostage negotiator on composure and authenticity under extreme pressure. Chapter 4 on tactical empathy directly addresses how to lower AU4 activation under adversarial questioning — applicable to board challenge dynamics.

Video
How Great Leaders Inspire Action
Simon Sinek (TED)

The foundational presence-based leadership communication framework. Most relevant to the strategic framing sections of this report where scores are highest — understanding why they work there helps you build the same pattern in the financial review window.

Video
Your Body Language May Shape Who You Are
Amy Cuddy (TED)

Directly applicable to the shoulder tension coaching point in this report. Cuddy's research on posture and hormonal response explains the mechanism behind the body language findings — and her pre-presentation prep protocol is directly implementable.

🎙
Podcast
The Knowledge Project with Shane Parrish
Shane Parrish / Farnam Street

Long-form conversations with world-class performers on decision-making under pressure, mental models, and composure. Directly aligned with the strategic leadership and resilience themes in this analysis. Start with episodes featuring leaders who operate in high-scrutiny, board-level environments.

🎙
Podcast
WorkLife with Adam Grant
Adam Grant / TED

Organisational psychology applied to real leadership challenges. Episodes on psychological safety, emotional expression in high-stakes environments, and managing composure under scrutiny directly address the coaching targets identified in this report.

Data Governance
Processing basis: Explicit consent (GDPR Art. 9(2)(a), BIPA s.15, PIPEDA s.7). Retention: 30 days (paid tier). Zero-retention architecture — video never stored. Audit hash: [REDACTED FOR SAMPLE].

Your first analysis
takes 90 seconds.

Upload any video. Get a report like this one. Free analysis available — no account required. The six proprietary scores unlock with a subscription starting at CAD $49/mo.

Free analysis · No credit card · Video stays on your device · Results in 90 seconds